UK court faults Home Office for unlawful act in Ghanaian health worker Visa extension case
The charity Ramfel, alongside Cecilia Adjei, a UK-based Ghanaian healthcare worker and mother of two, led the legal challenge.
The Home Office in the United Kingdom is confronting a new controversy similar to the Windrush scandal.
A significant High Court decision determined that the Home Secretary unlawfully failed to provide necessary documents to thousands of migrants, confirming their legal status in the UK.
The charity Ramfel, alongside Cecilia Adjei, a UK-based Ghanaian healthcare worker and mother of two, led the legal challenge.
Adjei, who moved to Britain from Ghana in 2000, and others like her, were affected by the Home Office's failure to issue confirmation documents.
These documents are crucial for migrants who have applied to extend their visas and are legally present in the UK during the processing period, known as "3C leave."
Without these documents, many migrants face job insecurity, difficulty accessing higher education, healthcare, and the right to rent a home.
This situation mirrors the challenges faced by the Windrush generation, who struggled to prove their legal residency and access essential services.
Mr. Justice Cavanagh ruled that the lack of digital proof for those on 3C leave was unlawful.
He emphasized that the legislative framework's intent is to create a hostile environment for undocumented individuals, not for those who are lawfully present.
Therefore, those legally in the UK should be provided with proper documentation to avoid such hardships.
The judge then urged the Home Secretary to take immediate action to prevent further suffering.